Posts Tagged ‘scoliosis specialists’

POSITIVE OUTCOME IN OVERWEIGHT PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS TREATED BY THE SPINECOR BRACE

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

The SpineCor brace was designed to meet specific functional requirements for the optimal treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. These requirements have been defined based on many years of research into the etiopathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Instead of using 3-point pressure biomechanical principles, the SpineCor brace uses curve specific “corrective movements”. These “corrective movements” produce global postural changes that correct the postural abnormalities associated with a specific curve classification and in turn, progressively reduce the Cobb angle. Repetition of the “corrective movements” through wearing the brace 20 hours per day can prevent progression or correct the scoliotic deformity (1).

Effectiveness of conservative treatment depends on patient maturity, curve properties and gender. More recently, body habitus has been found to be a predictive factor (2) in the orthotic treatment of AIS. Overweight patients will have greater curve progression and less successful results following treatment with rigid braces than those who are not obese. This finding is alarming, as more and more children are becoming overweight in developed countries (3).

Since the SpineCor brace uses a different treatment approach, we believe that body habitus will not interfere with the success of the brace. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of SpineCor brace treatment in AIS patients who were overweight with the outcome in patients who were not obese.

From December 1994 to May 2006, 503 patients were treated using the SpineCor brace. 190 patients were still actively being treated and 133 patients did not fit the research inclusion criteria proposed by the Scoliosis Research Society (4). To date, 180 patients have a definitive outcome. The cohort of patients was divided into two groups according to body habitus. Obese patients were defined as those with a body mass index in the 85% or greater. 

Assessment of the brace included:

  • number of patients who have 5º or less curve progression
  • number of patients who have 6º or more progression
  • number of patients with curves exceeding 45º at the end of treatment
  • number of patients who have been recommended/who have undergone surgery before skeletal maturity

Successful treatment (correction >5º or stabilization ±5º) was achieved in 110 patients of the 167 not overweight patients (65,9%) from the time of the fitting of the SpineCor brace to the point in which it was discontinued . 38 immature not obese patients (22,8%) required surgical fusion whilst receiving treatment and two patients out of 167 (1,2%) had curves exceeding 45º at maturity.

Successful treatment (correction >5º or stabilization ±5º) was achieved in 8 patients of the 13 overweight patients (61,5%) from the time of the fitting of the SpineCor brace to the point in which it was discontinued (Table 1). Tree immature obese patients (23,1%) required surgical fusion whilst receiving treatment and one patients out of 13 (7,7%) had curves exceeding 45º at maturity.

The results of the present study demonstrate that both overweight and normal AIS patients treated by the SpineCor brace have a positive outcome (62% and 66% of success respectively). This level of success has not been demonstrated for obese AIS patients using conventional 3-point pressure braces. We believe that SpineCor bracing is more successful in obese AIS patients because the application of dynamic corrective movements through the shoulders, thorax and pelvis is not adversely effected by excess subcutaneous tissue. Rigid 3-point pressure braces in contrast cannot effectively apply forces to the spine of an obese patient. However, future studies that will support and reinforce this finding are necessary.

REFERENCES

  1. 1. Coillard C, Leroux MA, Zabjek KF, Rivard CH. SpineCor–a non-rigid brace for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: post-treatment results. Eur Spine J. 2003; 12:141-48.
  2. 2. O’Neill PJ, Karol LA, Shindle MK, Elerson EE, BrintzenhofeSzoc KM, Katz DE, Farmer KW, Sponseller PD. Decreased orthotic effectiveness in overweight patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May; 87(5):1069-74
  3. 3. Dehghan M, Akhtar-Danesh N. Merchant AT. Childhood obesity, prevalence and prevention. Nutrition Journal. 2005 Sep 2; 4:24.
  4. 4. Richards BS, Bernstein RM, D’Amato CR, Thompson GH. Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management. Spine. 2005;30: 2068-75.

Survival analysis of the first weaned patients treated with the SpineCor brace

Monday, November 2nd, 2009
Rivard CH, Coillard C, Zabjek KF Research Centre, Sainte-Justine Hospital, 3175 chemin de la Coˆ te Ste-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1C5.
Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the success of treatment during the follow-up of a group of consecutively treated Idiopathic Scoliosis (IS) patients treated with the SpineCor brace 
Methods: A survival analysis was performed on 68 patients who had terminated treatment from a cohort of 200 consecutively treated patients with the SpineCor since 1994. A survival analysis was performed to estimate the probability of success at 1, 2, 3, 4 years post-treatment without brace. The difference between the initial radiological Cobb angle, and the last available Cobb angle during follow-up without brace was used to define a failure (aggravation of 5 degrees more) or success (stabilization, correction). The patient cohort was categorized as either less than 30 (G1), and greater than 30 (G2).

Results: For the total group of patients (Initial Cobb angle: 30 9) the trend during treatment wasa decrease in spinal curvature at three months with a mean difference of 9 (SD: 6), at termination of treatment (time ¼ 23 months) a mean difference of 5 (SD: 7); and at a follow-up time of 1, 2, 3 and 4 years there was a difference of 2  (SD: 7), 6  (SD: 5), 0  (SD: 8), and 8  (SD: 4) in reference to the initial condition. The survival analysis (G1 and G2) indicated a cumulative probability of success during follow-up without brace as follows. Year 1: probability (p) ¼ 1.00, 57

Abstracts (Confidence Interval (CI): 1.00 to 1.00) for G1,  p¼ 1.00 (CI: 1.00 to 1.00) for G2; Year 2: (p) ¼ 0.98 (CI: 0.93 to 1.00) for G1,  p¼ 0.92 (CI: 0.82 to 1.00) for G2; Year 3: p ¼0.92 (CI: 0.83 to 1.00) for G1, p¼ 0.92 (CI: 0.83 to 1.00) for G2; Year 4:  p¼ 0.88 (CI: 0.76 to 0.99) for G1, p ¼ 0.92 (CI: 0.73 to 1.00) for G2.

Conclusions: This initial cohort of patients demonstrated a  general trend of initial decrease in spinal curvature in brace, followed by a stabilization and/or correction at the end of treatment which was maintained through 1, 2, 3, and 4 years follow-up.

The SpineCor System

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

The SpineCor system is a flexible brace that is principally prescribed for Idiopathic Scoliosis patients with a Cobb angle between 15° and 50° and Risser sign 0 to 3.  The brace is fitted on the patient in accordance to a sub-classification of the traditional SRS definition of curve types.  The SpineCor Assistant Software guides the treatment provider through the fitting process.  The brace is prescribed to be worn by the patients 20 out of 24 hours per day until they have reached maturity, with radiological evaluations performed prior to and immediately following the fitting of the brace, and every 4 to 6 months afterwards.  To accommodate for growth and postural changes, corrective bands need to be adjusted frequently and require replacement each 6-12 months for optimum brace performance.

Evolution of scoliosis

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

Still, today, 80% of the scoliosis cases are known as idiopathic. Since the true cause is unknown, the treatment can only be based on the symptoms. Until now, only two types of treatment have been known to be efficient: the first is the treatment using an orthopaedic rigid brace and the second one is surgery with a spinal system.

In both cases, the therapeutic benefits can unfortunately be associated with non-negligible drawbacks that limit their uses.  Because of a better understanding of the risk associated and of the disease evolution, we have seen a shift towards earlier treatment.

The correlation between growth potential of the child, and, more specifically, of the adolescent, and the evolution of the scoliosis has been clearly established. It was demonstrated by Duval-Beaupère  and many others [inc. . This means that the earlier the scoliosis appears, the greater the risks of evolution. Lonstein & Carlson analysed the natural evolution of scoliosis in a population of 729 adolescents. They concluded that a child with an angle between 20° and 29° and a Risser of 0,1 or 2, will see his/her scoliosis evolve in 68% of the cases. Stagnara and Clarisse and other authors have named the 30° limit “the critical limit” because, beyond this point, during high velocity growth periods, evolution of the disease is guaranteed.

The New Adult Spinecor Scoliosis Pain Relief Back Brace

Monday, May 4th, 2009

  In 2005, Dr. Brian Ouellette, President of Scoliosis Specialists, started playing with the idea of a new scoliosis adult pelvic short for The Spinecor Brace.  One of Dr. Ouellette’s partners Dr. Lisa Tabick would wear the prototypes for hours at a time and give feedback for our engineers to make changes. We had difficulty with the comfort, wearability and materials. We needed an expert in braces and materials. We contacted the President of The Spine Corporation, Andrew Mills. Andrew was the expert we needed to help complete the design of the New Spinecor Adult Scoliosis Brace.

   After 2 years of trials and research we believe the New Adult Brace is ready to be launched. All of our hard work has paid off. As of April, 2009 the adult brace is being used in many countries throughout the World.

   Experience is the key factor in achieving a positive result. I recommend bracing with Doctors who have been using the new Adult Brace for years.

   I would like to thank one of the partners of Scoliosis Specialists, Dr. Tom Pappas out of Chicago, IL for his role in the development of the new adult brace. Dr. Pappas has been giving us his case studies as well as pre and post x-rays. This research enabled us to expedite the release of the adult brace to the World.

   Scoliosis Specialists has certified bracing centers all over the United States. All of these centers have the experience necessary to use the adult brace. You can find a certified center by going to www.scoliosisspecialists.com and clicking “contact us”.

   Scoliosis Specialists is continuing its research and development in the fight against Adult Scoliosis. For more information please call (877) 297-0901.


Health Business Directory - BTS Local