Posts Tagged ‘spinecor scoliosis specialists’

Effective Scoliosis Treatment

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

Scoliosis is a an abnormal lateral curve to the vertebral column.  The degree of scoliosis can range from mild to severe. Scoliosis is most commonly an incidental and harmless finding. Patients with milder curves may only need to visit their doctor for periodic observation. Scoliosis may be congenital (a birth defect) or acquired (degenerative, arthritic, or traumatic).

Majority of the scoliosis cases are known as idiopathic. Since the true cause is unknown, the treatment can only be based on the symptoms. Until now, only two types of treatment have been known to be efficient: the first is the treatment using an orthopaedic rigid brace and the second one is surgery with a spinal system. Unfortunately only a few treatments have actually been shown to affect the outcome of scoliosis.

The treatment options of scoliosis depend on the severity and the age of the person.  Scoliosis bracing has been shown to be an effective method to prevent curves from getting worse. Until recently, this treatment was reserved for children and adolescents in whom the prediction of a rapid increase in the curve needs to be thwarted.  Today, there is spinecor, a revolutionary new soft flexible scoliosis brace that has changed the way we look at scoliosis treatment both in kids and adults.

SpineCor changes the dynamic of the trunk while harmonizing the posture. It is a therapeutic means with less mechanical constraints and an acceptable comfort level that preserves and enhances movements with a double therapeutic action:   Progressive correction of the spine deformation and Neuro-muscular stimulation and correction.

The design of SpineCor happened through a scientific process based on decades of knowledge on scoliosis and its treatment. Therefore, we can be optimistic about its efficiency.  Before spinecor there were Rigid bracing sucah as the Boston Brace, the Providence Brace, and the Wilmington Brace which all utilize a three point pressure system to reduce the cobb angle measurement. Dynamic bracing, such as SpineCor, uses muscle activity to enhance cortical activation while encouraging the bodies natural reflexes to improve muscle recruitment patterns, thereby potentially rehabilitating the postural support systems.

 

Survival analysis of the first weaned patients treated with the SpineCor brace

Monday, November 2nd, 2009
Rivard CH, Coillard C, Zabjek KF Research Centre, Sainte-Justine Hospital, 3175 chemin de la Coˆ te Ste-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1C5.
Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the success of treatment during the follow-up of a group of consecutively treated Idiopathic Scoliosis (IS) patients treated with the SpineCor brace 
Methods: A survival analysis was performed on 68 patients who had terminated treatment from a cohort of 200 consecutively treated patients with the SpineCor since 1994. A survival analysis was performed to estimate the probability of success at 1, 2, 3, 4 years post-treatment without brace. The difference between the initial radiological Cobb angle, and the last available Cobb angle during follow-up without brace was used to define a failure (aggravation of 5 degrees more) or success (stabilization, correction). The patient cohort was categorized as either less than 30 (G1), and greater than 30 (G2).

Results: For the total group of patients (Initial Cobb angle: 30 9) the trend during treatment wasa decrease in spinal curvature at three months with a mean difference of 9 (SD: 6), at termination of treatment (time ¼ 23 months) a mean difference of 5 (SD: 7); and at a follow-up time of 1, 2, 3 and 4 years there was a difference of 2  (SD: 7), 6  (SD: 5), 0  (SD: 8), and 8  (SD: 4) in reference to the initial condition. The survival analysis (G1 and G2) indicated a cumulative probability of success during follow-up without brace as follows. Year 1: probability (p) ¼ 1.00, 57

Abstracts (Confidence Interval (CI): 1.00 to 1.00) for G1,  p¼ 1.00 (CI: 1.00 to 1.00) for G2; Year 2: (p) ¼ 0.98 (CI: 0.93 to 1.00) for G1,  p¼ 0.92 (CI: 0.82 to 1.00) for G2; Year 3: p ¼0.92 (CI: 0.83 to 1.00) for G1, p¼ 0.92 (CI: 0.83 to 1.00) for G2; Year 4:  p¼ 0.88 (CI: 0.76 to 0.99) for G1, p ¼ 0.92 (CI: 0.73 to 1.00) for G2.

Conclusions: This initial cohort of patients demonstrated a  general trend of initial decrease in spinal curvature in brace, followed by a stabilization and/or correction at the end of treatment which was maintained through 1, 2, 3, and 4 years follow-up.


Health Business Directory - BTS Local